On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 4/22/2010 12:13 PM, Khelben Blackstaff wrote: >> WD mentions in the customer help (Answer ID 5357) that these newer drives >> were validated to 1M load/unload cycles and not 300K. > > Weird, I wonder if they just forgot to update the spec sheet for the > drive then since it says 300k. Validated doesn't mean spec'ed, right? So they spec it at 300K but they test and find that some units go to 1M, so they report that some units go to 1M but they keep the spec at 300K. We feel more comfortable with the operation but if the drive fails at 400K then they are within their rights to say the drive lived a useful life and replace or not replace it as they see fit. I have 7 of these WD10EARS green drives, one in the machine I reported on that's 350 miles away, but 6 sitting in boxes here. I think I'll look into using the WD program to modify one or two of them and then start some testing. Keep in mind that just because we possibly solve the load cycle count problem doesn't mean that the drive will work for RAID. WD has also stated that these drives don't have any TLER features. I'll report back how that goes, but I don't know exactly when. Cheers, Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
