Mark Knecht wrote:
Richard,
Good point. I was limited in my thinking to the sorts of arrays I
might use at home being no wider than 3, 4 or 5 disks. However for our
N-wide array as N approaches infinity so do the cycles required to run
it. I don think that applies to the OP but I don't know that.
I said I thought the busiest CPU was the parity generation one, but in
hindsight this cannot be correct, as it was almost maxed out at half the
write speed the array achieved when it was empty.
Regards,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
