Re: Another take on replacing failed raid drives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26/03/2010 15:06, John Hendrikx wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
I stumbled on this description of replacing a drive in a raid array. I share it because different takes on a subject are usesful, and because he had multiple arrays using partitions of the failed drive, rather than a partitioned array.

http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=1368

I do that too (multiple arrays using partitions). My reason for that is to make future upgrades less painful as it is possible to just copy and drop one array at a time.

I do that too, but my reason is that the arrays are different types. For example, first partitions make RAID-1 for /boot, second partitions RAID-1 or RAID-10 swap, third partitions RAID-5 or RAID-6 filesystem (or several over LVM).

Cheers,

John.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux