On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:26 AM, stuart-b-uk <stuart.buckell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > We have a RAID-5 4x 250GB SATA running on an Intel SATA Hardware Raid > controller. > > Yesterday a drive failed, which was replaced, however we did not have > another matching drive, therefore it didn't like what it saw and wouldn't > rebuild. > > Someone accessed files over HTTP and for some reason the filesystem went > into readonly mode. > > The system is now degradding to 3 drives Raid-5, and is at 20% after 12 > hours. > > The problem we have is a critical folder exists but has nothing inside it, > except a few question marks when the directory is listed via bash. > > My question is:- > > 1) Is it likely after the raid has gone from 750GB to 495GB that we will > ever see these files again? > 2) Can you recommend any recovery software which might be able to get these > files back? > 3) Has anyone experienced random loss of files from a rebuild of RAID-5 > before? > > I appreciate the importance of backing up, unfortunately, this is the only > folder in the system that wasn't set up in the backup routine properly, and > yes, Murphy struck again... > > Thanks to anyone who can help, > > Regards, > > Stuart > -- > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/RAID-5-Degraded%2C-Seemed-to-have-lost-files--Please-help%21-tp26792453p26792453.html > Sent from the linux-raid mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > 1. A 4 x 250GB drive array is 750GB to begin with as one drive is used for parity. Thus when it degrades it is still 750GB in size. When only one drive is lost the performance of the array goes down, but all data should be accessible. 3. If using the onboard Intel Matrix fake RAID controller then yes I have heard of them loosing arrays and not rebuilding correctly. For critical data either a hardware RAID controller with battery backed cache or software RAID (mdadm). Supposedly new versions of mdadm support the Intel Matrix metadata. You might be able to reassemble the array using mdadm to recovery the data. I would probably start by shutting down the system and making a dd copy of each drive in another system so you have a copy of the data. Of course if the data is highly important you might just send the drives off to be recovered. Ryan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
