On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 08:30:02AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Luca Berra,
In message <20091211071526.GA4062@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> you wrote:
While in similar setups, data protection should be handled by the
storage system, raid 1 has its uses in a failover setup with two sites.
Would one not rather use something like DRBD for such a szenario? And
OCFS2 on top of that?
it depends, if i have an high speed (i.e. FC) link between the two site
i might want to avoid the overhead, besides if we have more than one
node for site, would drbd work?
L.
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@xxxxxxxxxx
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
