On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:54:42 +0100
Andre Noll <maan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks again.
I have made most of the changes you suggest.
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set)
> > + if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
> > + !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags)) {
> > + /* Take two references, one is dropped
> > + * when request finishes, one after
> > + * we reclaim rcu_read_lock
> > + */
> > + struct bio *bi;
> > + atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
> > + atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > + bi = bio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL, 0);
> > + bi->bi_end_io = md_end_barrier;
> > + bi->bi_private = rdev;
> > + bi->bi_bdev = rdev->bdev;
> > + atomic_inc(&mddev->flush_pending);
> > + submit_bio(WRITE_BARRIER, bi);
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + rdev_dec_pending(rdev, mddev);
> > + }
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
>
> Calling atomic_inc() twice isn't an atomic operation any more. If
> this doesn't matter (because all modifications of rdev->nr_pending
> are supposed to happen within RCU read-side critical sections) then
> why is rdev->nr_pending an atomic_t at all?
Calling atomic_inc() twice is still two atomic operations, and that is what I
need.
The important thing is that the read-modify-write cycle of atomic_inc isn't
interrupted, so if two thread both do atomic_inc at the same time the result
really is adding 2, not just adding one.
Multiple RCU read-side blocks can run at the same time on different
processors - so we definitely need to protection of 'atomic_'.
Here is the new version of the patch - thanks.
NeilBrown
>From 87d04b8950f80e77b376531506cae08387578f64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:49:51 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] md: support barrier requests on all personalities.
Previously barriers were only supported on RAID1. This is because
other levels requires synchronisation across all devices and so needed
a different approach.
Here is that approach.
When a barrier arrives, we send a zero-length barrier to every active
device. When that completes - and if the original request was not
empty - we submit the barrier request itself (with the barrier flag
cleared) and then submit a fresh load of zero length barriers.
The barrier request itself is asynchronous, but any subsequent
request will block until the barrier completes.
The reason for clearing the barrier flag is that a barrier request is
allowed to fail. If we pass a non-empty barrier through a striping
raid level it is conceivable that part of it could succeed and part
could fail. That would be way too hard to deal with.
So if the first run of zero length barriers succeed, we assume all is
sufficiently well that we send the request and ignore errors in the
second run of barriers.
RAID5 needs extra care as write requests may not have been submitted
to the underlying devices yet. So we flush the stripe cache before
proceeding with the barrier.
Note that the second set of zero-length barriers are submitted
immediately after the original request is submitted. Thus when
a personality finds mddev->barrier to be set during make_request,
it should not return from make_request until the corresponding
per-device request(s) have been queued.
That will be done in later patches.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/linear.c | 2 +-
drivers/md/md.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/md/md.h | 12 +++++
drivers/md/multipath.c | 2 +-
drivers/md/raid0.c | 2 +-
drivers/md/raid10.c | 2 +-
drivers/md/raid5.c | 8 +++-
7 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/linear.c b/drivers/md/linear.c
index 1ceceb3..3b3f77c 100644
--- a/drivers/md/linear.c
+++ b/drivers/md/linear.c
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static int linear_make_request (struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
int cpu;
if (unlikely(bio_rw_flagged(bio, BIO_RW_BARRIER))) {
- bio_endio(bio, -EOPNOTSUPP);
+ md_barrier_request(mddev, bio);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index eaf0a92..c94b6cd 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -217,12 +217,12 @@ static int md_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
return 0;
}
rcu_read_lock();
- if (mddev->suspended) {
+ if (mddev->suspended || mddev->barrier) {
DEFINE_WAIT(__wait);
for (;;) {
prepare_to_wait(&mddev->sb_wait, &__wait,
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- if (!mddev->suspended)
+ if (!mddev->suspended && !mddev->barrier)
break;
rcu_read_unlock();
schedule();
@@ -264,10 +264,110 @@ static void mddev_resume(mddev_t *mddev)
int mddev_congested(mddev_t *mddev, int bits)
{
+ if (mddev->barrier)
+ return 1;
return mddev->suspended;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mddev_congested);
+/*
+ * Generic barrier handling for md
+ */
+
+#define POST_REQUEST_BARRIER ((void*)1)
+
+static void md_end_barrier(struct bio *bio, int err)
+{
+ mdk_rdev_t *rdev = bio->bi_private;
+ mddev_t *mddev = rdev->mddev;
+ if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP && mddev->barrier != POST_REQUEST_BARRIER)
+ set_bit(BIO_EOPNOTSUPP, &mddev->barrier->bi_flags);
+
+ rdev_dec_pending(rdev, mddev);
+
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mddev->flush_pending)) {
+ if (mddev->barrier == POST_REQUEST_BARRIER) {
+ /* This was a post-request barrier */
+ mddev->barrier = NULL;
+ wake_up(&mddev->sb_wait);
+ } else
+ /* The pre-request barrier has finished */
+ schedule_work(&mddev->barrier_work);
+ }
+ bio_put(bio);
+}
+
+static void submit_barriers(mddev_t *mddev)
+{
+ mdk_rdev_t *rdev;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set)
+ if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
+ !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags)) {
+ /* Take two references, one is dropped
+ * when request finishes, one after
+ * we reclaim rcu_read_lock
+ */
+ struct bio *bi;
+ atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
+ atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ bi = bio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL, 0);
+ bi->bi_end_io = md_end_barrier;
+ bi->bi_private = rdev;
+ bi->bi_bdev = rdev->bdev;
+ atomic_inc(&mddev->flush_pending);
+ submit_bio(WRITE_BARRIER, bi);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ rdev_dec_pending(rdev, mddev);
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+static void md_submit_barrier(struct work_struct *ws)
+{
+ mddev_t *mddev = container_of(ws, mddev_t, barrier_work);
+ struct bio *bio = mddev->barrier;
+
+ atomic_set(&mddev->flush_pending, 1);
+
+ if (test_bit(BIO_EOPNOTSUPP, &bio->bi_flags))
+ bio_endio(bio, -EOPNOTSUPP);
+ else if (bio->bi_size == 0)
+ /* an empty barrier - all done */
+ bio_endio(bio, 0);
+ else {
+ bio->bi_rw &= ~(1<<BIO_RW_BARRIER);
+ if (mddev->pers->make_request(mddev->queue, bio))
+ generic_make_request(bio);
+ mddev->barrier = POST_REQUEST_BARRIER;
+ submit_barriers(mddev);
+ }
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mddev->flush_pending)) {
+ mddev->barrier = NULL;
+ wake_up(&mddev->sb_wait);
+ }
+}
+
+void md_barrier_request(mddev_t *mddev, struct bio *bio)
+{
+ spin_lock_irq(&mddev->write_lock);
+ wait_event_lock_irq(mddev->sb_wait,
+ !mddev->barrier,
+ mddev->write_lock, /*nothing*/);
+ mddev->barrier = bio;
+ spin_unlock_irq(&mddev->write_lock);
+
+ atomic_set(&mddev->flush_pending, 1);
+ INIT_WORK(&mddev->barrier_work, md_submit_barrier);
+
+ submit_barriers(mddev);
+
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mddev->flush_pending))
+ schedule_work(&mddev->barrier_work);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(md_barrier_request);
static inline mddev_t *mddev_get(mddev_t *mddev)
{
@@ -375,6 +475,7 @@ static mddev_t * mddev_find(dev_t unit)
atomic_set(&new->openers, 0);
atomic_set(&new->active_io, 0);
spin_lock_init(&new->write_lock);
+ atomic_set(&new->flush_pending, 0);
init_waitqueue_head(&new->sb_wait);
init_waitqueue_head(&new->recovery_wait);
new->reshape_position = MaxSector;
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
index 9e2c412..0569e8f 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.h
+++ b/drivers/md/md.h
@@ -292,6 +292,17 @@ struct mddev_s
struct mutex bitmap_mutex;
struct list_head all_mddevs;
+
+ /* Generic barrier handling.
+ * If there is a pending barrier request, all other
+ * writes are blocked while the devices are flushed.
+ * The last to finish a flush schedules a worker to
+ * submit the barrier request (without the barrier flag),
+ * then submit more flush requests.
+ */
+ struct bio *barrier;
+ atomic_t flush_pending;
+ struct work_struct barrier_work;
};
@@ -432,6 +443,7 @@ extern void md_done_sync(mddev_t *mddev, int blocks, int ok);
extern void md_error(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *rdev);
extern int mddev_congested(mddev_t *mddev, int bits);
+extern void md_barrier_request(mddev_t *mddev, struct bio *bio);
extern void md_super_write(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *rdev,
sector_t sector, int size, struct page *page);
extern void md_super_wait(mddev_t *mddev);
diff --git a/drivers/md/multipath.c b/drivers/md/multipath.c
index ee7646f..cbc0a99 100644
--- a/drivers/md/multipath.c
+++ b/drivers/md/multipath.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int multipath_make_request (struct request_queue *q, struct bio * bio)
int cpu;
if (unlikely(bio_rw_flagged(bio, BIO_RW_BARRIER))) {
- bio_endio(bio, -EOPNOTSUPP);
+ md_barrier_request(mddev, bio);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid0.c b/drivers/md/raid0.c
index d3a4ce0..122d07a 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid0.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid0.c
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static int raid0_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
int cpu;
if (unlikely(bio_rw_flagged(bio, BIO_RW_BARRIER))) {
- bio_endio(bio, -EOPNOTSUPP);
+ md_barrier_request(mddev, bio);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index c2cb7b8..2fbf867 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ static int make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio * bio)
mdk_rdev_t *blocked_rdev;
if (unlikely(bio_rw_flagged(bio, BIO_RW_BARRIER))) {
- bio_endio(bio, -EOPNOTSUPP);
+ md_barrier_request(mddev, bio);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index d29215d..ecf89c8 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -3866,7 +3866,13 @@ static int make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio * bi)
int cpu, remaining;
if (unlikely(bio_rw_flagged(bi, BIO_RW_BARRIER))) {
- bio_endio(bi, -EOPNOTSUPP);
+ /* Drain all pending writes. We only really need
+ * to ensure they have been submitted, but this is
+ * easier.
+ */
+ mddev->pers->quiesce(mddev, 1);
+ mddev->pers->quiesce(mddev, 0);
+ md_barrier_request(mddev, bi);
return 0;
}
--
1.6.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
