Re: mismatch_cnt again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, November 10, 2009 8:54 am, Piergiorgio Sartor wrote:
> <snip>
> 
> check/repair is primarily about reading every block on every device,
> and being ready to cope with read errors by overwriting with the
> correct data.  This is known as scrubbing I believe.
> I would normally just 'repair' every month or so.  If there are
> discrepancies I would like them reported and fixed.  I they happen
> often on a non-swap partition, I would like to knoe about it, otherwise
> I would rather they were just fixed.

Bingo - and according to the list archive many of us are getting mismatches
without swap anywhere near the raid in question. The current situation is
more akin to "Ok folks get in the plane, we're deploying in 2 hours, and
btw your chute is not going to open and there is nothing you can do about
it" How is that for a threat model :)

Please someone step in and add *some* sort of reporting about which
particular blocks are screwed, so a user can figure out which data is(about
to) be lost.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux