Re: md software raid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 05:06:46PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 October 2009, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 
> > xfs_check is more or less deprecated; it is known to have large memory
> > requirements, and xfs_repair is the tool to use.
> 
> What about adding a warning message to it then? I guess most people don't 
> check list archives first before using it. 

IIUC, the plan is to add the one set of checks to xfs_repair that it
currently doesn't do (doesn't check free space trees because it
simply rebuilds them from scratch during the repair process), then
xfs_check will be changed to be wrapper around xfs_repair. i.e. the
xfs_check command is most likely not going away, just changing
implementation....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux