> That's certainly a valid point, if you are stuck using xfs by preference > or requirement. I have seen claims that 2.6.32 will be better, but I > have no intention of testing it, having parted company with xfs a while > ago. May I ask, "Why?" I am running XFS on both my video server and its backup. Generally I have been very pleased. The only issue I have had was trying to fsck the arrays. I only have 10G of swap space, and XFS requires much more than that to successfully check file systems in excess of 6T. It wasn't a really big deal, however. I just plugged in a 750G drive, shut down the default swap, and turned it up on the large drive. Once done, I switched the swap back to the boot drive. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
