Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [md2_raid1:358]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If you search the linux-raid mailing list archive for emails during
October, I think you'll find a related thread with an answer (or
more).

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've been deliberately monitoring the kernel via the git web interfaces, and
> I can't yet see the patch committed that supposedly fixed this.  (Please
> correct me if it was actually committed.)
>
> While a single 10s stuck CPU may not be serious, it *is* serious when it
> happens over and over and over again consecutively (like it does in my
> case).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lee.
>
>
> Majed B. wrote:
>>
>> And it's not serious.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Majed B. <majedb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I believe this has been fixed in 2.6.30 or 2.6.31.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Steven Haigh <netwiz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> When trying to run a check using:
>>>>       echo check > /sys/block/md2/md/sync_action
>>>>
>>>> I got the following errors printed to the console:
>>>>
>>>> Oct 21 13:31:03 wireless kernel: md: syncing RAID array md2
>>>> Oct 21 13:31:03 wireless kernel: md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction
>>>> speed: 1000 KB/sec/disc.
>>>> Oct 21 13:31:03 wireless kernel: md: using maximum available idle IO
>>>> bandwidth (but not more than 20000 KB/sec) for reconstruction.
>>>> Oct 21 13:31:03 wireless kernel: md: using 128k window, over a total of
>>>> 300511808 blocks.
>>>> BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [md2_raid1:358]
>>>>
>>>> Pid: 358, comm:            md2_raid1
>>>> EIP: 0060:[<c04ec1bc>] CPU: 0
>>>> EIP is at memcmp+0xd/0x22
>>>>  EFLAGS: 00000202    Not tainted  (2.6.18-164.el5 #1)
>>>> EAX: 00000000 EBX: e2826fe0 ECX: d15f3fe0 EDX: 00000000
>>>> ESI: 00000020 EDI: 00000090 EBP: f70b8e40 DS: 007b ES: 007b
>>>> CR0: 8005003b CR2: 0806af70 CR3: 37872000 CR4: 000006d0
>>>>  [<f8843c64>] raid1d+0x270/0xbea [raid1]
>>>>  [<c0616870>] schedule+0x9cc/0xa55
>>>>  [<c0616f33>] schedule_timeout+0x13/0x8c
>>>>  [<c05a6b5e>] md_thread+0xdf/0xf5
>>>>  [<c0434907>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2d
>>>>  [<c05a6a7f>] md_thread+0x0/0xf5
>>>>  [<c0434845>] kthread+0xc0/0xeb
>>>>  [<c0434785>] kthread+0x0/0xeb
>>>>  [<c0405c53>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
>>>>  =======================
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:50 wireless kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s!
>>>> [md2_raid1:358]
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:50 wireless kernel:
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:50 wireless kernel: Pid: 358, comm:            md2_raid1
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:50 wireless kernel: EIP: 0060:[<c04ec1bc>] CPU: 0
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:50 wireless kernel: EIP is at memcmp+0xd/0x22
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:50 wireless kernel:  EFLAGS: 00000202    Not tainted
>>>>  (2.6.18-164.el5 #1)
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:50 wireless kernel: EAX: 00000000 EBX: e2826fe0 ECX:
>>>> d15f3fe0
>>>> EDX: 00000000
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:50 wireless kernel: ESI: 00000020 EDI: 00000090 EBP:
>>>> f70b8e40
>>>> DS: 007b ES: 007b
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:50 wireless kernel: CR0: 8005003b CR2: 0806af70 CR3:
>>>> 37872000
>>>> CR4: 000006d0
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:50 wireless kernel:  [<f8843c64>] raid1d+0x270/0xbea
>>>> [raid1]
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:50 wireless kernel:  [<c0616870>] schedule+0x9cc/0xa55
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:50 wireless kernel:  [<c0616f33>]
>>>> schedule_timeout+0x13/0x8c
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:50 wireless kernel:  [<c05a6b5e>] md_thread+0xdf/0xf5
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:51 wireless kernel:  [<c0434907>]
>>>> autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2d
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:51 wireless kernel:  [<c05a6a7f>] md_thread+0x0/0xf5
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:51 wireless kernel:  [<c0434845>] kthread+0xc0/0xeb
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:51 wireless kernel:  [<c0434785>] kthread+0x0/0xeb
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:51 wireless kernel:  [<c0405c53>]
>>>> kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
>>>> Oct 21 13:37:51 wireless kernel:  =======================
>>>>
>>>> This is using CentOS 5.3 with Kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 on an i686.
>>>>
>>>> Is this a serious type error? Is there anything else I can supply to
>>>> diagnose things more?
>>>>
>>>> # mdadm --detail /dev/md2
>>>> /dev/md2:
>>>>       Version : 00.90.03
>>>>  Creation Time : Mon Feb 23 17:15:41 2009
>>>>    Raid Level : raid1
>>>>    Array Size : 300511808 (286.59 GiB 307.72 GB)
>>>>  Used Dev Size : 300511808 (286.59 GiB 307.72 GB)
>>>>  Raid Devices : 2
>>>>  Total Devices : 2
>>>> Preferred Minor : 2
>>>>   Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>>>>
>>>>   Update Time : Wed Oct 21 13:46:28 2009
>>>>         State : clean, resyncing
>>>>  Active Devices : 2
>>>> Working Devices : 2
>>>>  Failed Devices : 0
>>>>  Spare Devices : 0
>>>>
>>>>  Rebuild Status : 5% complete
>>>>
>>>>          UUID : fed99e3d:d08fdcc9:b9593a45:2cc09736
>>>>        Events : 0.30584
>>>>
>>>>   Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
>>>>      0       3        3        0      active sync   /dev/hda3
>>>>      1      22        3        1      active sync   /dev/hdc3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Steven Haigh
>>>>
>>>> Email: netwiz@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> Web: http://www.crc.id.au
>>>> Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>      Majed B.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
       Majed B.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux