RE: Disappointing RAID10 Performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> # time dd if={somelarge}.iso of=/dev/null bs={readahead size}
> 
> /dev/sd?
>  1024 71.3 MB/s
>  2048 71.2 MB/s
>  4096 77.7 MB/s
>  8192 69.4 MB/s
>  16384 76.6 MB/s
> 
> /dev/md2
>  1024  67.1
>  2048  69.1
>  4096  75.7
>  8192  64.9
>  16384 69.0
> 
> Using RAID10offset2 on 2 WD 2TB drives, and always the same input file.

	RAID10 on 2 drives?  Are you striping partitions on a single drive?
You won't get much of a performance boost that way.

> Why would RAID10 performance be -poorer-?
> If it weren't for mirroring, this wouldn't be worth it.

Is this with all drives local, or are you mirroring across a Gig-E link, as
I believe you said you were going to do?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux