Re: Disappointing RAID10 Performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- On Fri, 10/16/09, Rob Becker <Rob.Becker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>    What command did you use to create your
> raid-10?

/
mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=raid1 --chunk=256 --raid-disks=2 missing /dev/sdb1
swap
mdadm --create /dev/md1 --level=raid10 --layout=o2 --chunk=256 --raid-disks=2 missing /dev/sdb2
/home
mdadm --create /dev/md2 --level=raid10 --layout=o2 --chunk=1024 --raid-disks=2 missing /dev/sdb3
... then copied files and later added the sda parts to the array. (RAID conversion on live system)


>  You might try  
> running iostat in parallel to see if the read_balancer is
> properly  
> balancing the reads between the two disks.

Don't understand this as I'm a bit of a n00b...


--- On Fri, 10/16/09, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If you only use your RAID-10 array for a single "dd
> if=bigfile of=/dev/null" then yes, it does not give you much
> over mirroring.
> 
> If you start using your drives for two "dd if=bigfile[12]
> of=/dev/null" at the same time, you will notice the
> difference.

OK so it was a fallacy to think this would help with large files, unless more than one is involved.




      
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux