Re: [mdadm PATCH] Introduce a commandline option for setting RebuildNN increment size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As a end user I like the idea. Two questions around the choice of
increments, though.

If we're going to allow values up 99, why not include 100? To my mind,
reporting 0% -> 99% -> 100% offers about the same value as reporting
0% -> 100%.

Also, It seems to me that increments beyond 50 aren't really that
useful. For example, reporting 0% -> 75% -> 100% seems a bit odd to
me, even for extremely fast rebuilds. Units up to 50 (0%, 50%, 100%)
make more sense.


-- 
Drew

"Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood."
--Marie Curie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux