Re: Load-balancing mirrors w/ asymmetric performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Chris Worley <worleys@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When you mirror two devices, they may not have the same performance.
> For example, if one device is local and the other remote.
>
> There's nothing you can do about writes, as everything needs written.
>
> But, reads shouldn't be split 50/50: they should be balanced depending
> relative performance of each mirror to optimize overall read
> performance.

And MD already has the ability to flag the slow paths as write-mostly, see:

mdadm ... --write-mostly

There is also '--write-behind' support for devices that have been
tagged as 'write-mostly'.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux