--- On Sat, 10/10/09, Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm not familiar with NX. Why not
> X11?
I tried to set up remote X a long time ago, but it was just too problematic. NX does essentially the same thing, and has built-in security. (nomachine.com) Works great, and is very fast.
> > I'm not about to use bloatware like NFS or Samba. And
> sshfs or an SSH
> > tunnel could not keep up the speeds I'd need. How do
> you suppose Qnap
>
> Why do you say that? From what I
> have seen of your requirements, it
> doesn't sound like you will require very much at all in the
> way of speed on
> your array.
Why do I say that? Because they -are- bloatware, and an unnecessary fat layer in the system, with all the potential for error and security breach that implies. iSCSI is the way, in the 21st century.
> Speaking of which, I never did see where
> you posted the results of
> any drive access metrics.
I'm sure I mentioned these are the WD 2TB drives. Straight read 77.7MB/s in RAID10offset.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
