Re: Remote NAS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- On Wed, 9/23/09, Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Writes are about the same for RAID10 types and RAID1.
> This is also what theory would tell for random writes,
> given that they
> are random, and that the elevator algorithm of the file
> system optimizes
> the writing. 
> 
> Yes, offset came after far, but Neil Brown said that offset
> was
> implemented to make Linux MD align to RAID standards. It
> was not
> necessarily meant to be better than far. 
> 
> I think it is hard to beat raid10 far on reads (but then I
> am also the
> one that invented the layout). As said for random reading
> and writing
> the theory says that all mirrored raid types perform
> equally, and tests
> verify this. Maybe far layout even has an edge for random
> reading, in
> theory it should, but I have not seen tests really
> verifying that.

Excellent, thanks Keld.




      
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux