--- On Wed, 9/23/09, Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > There is a setup described at > > http://linux-raid.osdl.org/index.php/Preventing_against_a_failing_disk > > You can substitute raid10,o2 for raid10,f2 for the root > partitions etc. > > Anyway, raid10,f2 should be faster than raid10,o2, for at > least reads, > while for writes it is about the same performance given > that you employ > a file system. Thanks keld. I used this procedure, which does about the same thing and seems more clear, adapting it to RAID10-o2: http://www.howtoforge.com/software-raid1-grub-boot-debian-etch I could find no performance comparison with far and offset, and knew that far improved on reads, so since offset came later inferred that it would have improved writes. No objective data to confirm otherwise. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
