Re: RAID 5 array recovery - two drives errors in external enclosure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think the direct SATA connections ended up making them get reversed.
sdb = sdf now
sdc = sde now
..... I think....

I labeled the drives as I pulled them out of the enclosure... I'll
make sure they match up and then try your suggestions.  I just now
noticed the chunk size issue as well.  <ugh>


-Tim


On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Majed B. <majedb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Looking at your initial examine output, seems like the proper order is: bdce.
>
> If the hardware resets have gone after plugging into a normal PC case,
> with different SATA cables, then I'd say the cables in your external
> enclosure might be the suspect here.
>
> As Robin said, make sure you have the disks in the proper original
> order as they were previously and that the chunksize is the same as
> before.
>
> This should do it: mdadm -C /dev/md0 -l 5 -n 5 -c 256 /dev/sd[bdce]1 missing
> (notice the order)
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu Sep 17, 2009 at 01:42:30PM -0700, Tim Bostrom wrote:
>>
>>> OK,
>>>
>>> Let me start off by saying - I panicked.  Rule #1 - don't panic.  I
>>> did.  Sorry.
>>>
>>> I have a RAID 5 array running on Fedora 10.
>>> (Linux tera.teambostrom.com 2.6.27.30-170.2.82.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Mon
>>> Aug 17 08:38:59 EDT 2009 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux)
>>>
>>> 5 drives in an external enclosure (AMS eSATA Venus T5).  It's a
>>> Sil4726 inside the enclosure running to a Sil3132 controller via eSATA
>>> in the desktop.  I had been running this setup for just over a year.
>>> Was working fine.   I just moved into a new home and had my server
>>> down for a while  - before I brought it back online, I got a "great
>>> idea" to blow out the dust from the enclosure using compressed air.
>>> When I finally brought up the array again, I noticed that drives were
>>> missing.  Tried re-adding the drives to the array and had some issues
>>> - they seemed to get added but after a short time of rebuilding the
>>> array, I would get a bunch of HW resets in dmesg and then the array
>>> would kick out drives and stop.
>>>
>> <- much snippage ->
>>
>>> I popped the drives out of the enclosure and into the actual tower
>>> case and connected each of them to its own SATA port.  The HW resets
>>> seemed to go away, but I couldn't get the array to come back online.
>>>  Then I did the stupid panic (following someone's advice I shouldn't
>>> have).
>>>
>>> thinking I should just re-create the array, I did:
>>>
>>> mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=5 --raid-devices=5 /dev/sd[b-f]1
>>>
>>> Stupid me again - ignores the warning that it belongs to an array
>>> already.  I let it build for a minute or so and then tried to mount it
>>> while rebuilding... and got error messages:
>>>
>>> EXT3-fs: unable to read superblock
>>> EXT3-fs: md0: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features
>>> (3fd18e00).
>>>
>>> Now - I'm at a loss.  I'm afraid to do anything else.   I've been
>>> viewing the FAQ and I have a few ideas, but I'm just more freaked.  Is
>>> there any hope?  What should I do next without causing more trouble?
>>>
>> Looking at the mdadm output, there's a couple of possible errors.
>> Firstly, your newly created array has a different chunksize than your
>> original one.  Secondly, the drives may be in the wrong order.  In
>> either case, providing you don't _actually_ have any faulty drives, then
>> it should be (mostly) recoverable.
>>
>> Given the order you specified the drives in the create, sdf1 will be the
>> partition that's been trashed by the rebuild, so you'll want to leave
>> that out altogether for now.
>>
>> You need to try to recreate the array with the correct chunk size and
>> with the remaining drives in different orders, running a read-only
>> filesystem check each time until you find the correct order.
>>
>> So start with:
>>    mdadm -C /dev/md0 -l 5 -n 5 -c 256 /dev/sd[bcde]1 missing
>>
>> Then repeat for every possible order of the four disks and "missing",
>> stopping the array each time if the mount fails.
>>
>> When you've finally found the correct order, you can re-add sdf1 to get
>> the array back to normal.
>>
>> HTH,
>>    Robin
>> --
>>     ___
>>    ( ' }     |       Robin Hill        <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
>>   / / )      | Little Jim says ....                            |
>>  // !!       |      "He fallen in de water !!"                 |
>>
>
>
>
> --
>       Majed B.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



-- 
-tim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux