Re: LVM and Raid5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Majed B." <majedb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I tested with both dd and hdparm, and in both cases, md0 proved to be
> much faster than the LV itself.

This is quite odd because usually an LVM2 logical volume is just a simple
linear device-mapper target onto the backing device. I could imagine a small
performance change but a large one really surprises me. Could there be
something going on here wrt sync vs non-sync IO?

Best wishes,

Chris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux