I forgot to mention that I'm running mdadm 2.6.7.1 (latest in Ubuntu Server repositories). I tried forcing the assembly, but as mentioned, I just got an error: root@Adam:/var/www# mdadm -Af /dev/md0 mdadm: superblock on /dev/sdh1 doesn't match others - assembly aborted I know I could've pasted whatever I wrote here, but it seemed redundant. I'll keep your hint in mind for the next time, if any (hopefully not). This may be of an interest to you: root@Adam:/var/www# mdadm -E /dev/sd[a-h]1 | grep Reshap sda1 Reshape pos'n : 3357066496 (3201.55 GiB 3437.64 GB) sdb1 Reshape pos'n : 3357066496 (3201.55 GiB 3437.64 GB) sdc1 Reshape pos'n : 3357066496 (3201.55 GiB 3437.64 GB) sdd1 Reshape pos'n : 3357066496 (3201.55 GiB 3437.64 GB) sde1 Reshape pos'n : 3357066496 (3201.55 GiB 3437.64 GB) sdf1 Reshape pos'n : 3357066496 (3201.55 GiB 3437.64 GB) sdg1 Reshape pos'n : 2554257664 (2435.93 GiB 2615.56 GB) sdh1 Reshape pos'n : 3357066496 (3201.55 GiB 3437.64 GB) Note that sdd1 was the spare. The UUIDs are all the same and the superblock is all similar except for the reshaping position of sdg1. I didn't try to recreate the array as I've never faced this issue before, so I don't know what kind of repercussions it may have. What I do know, that at the worst case scenario, I can recreate the array out of 7 disks (all but sdg1), but lose about 2.3TB worth of data :( On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:32 AM, NeilBrown<neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, September 6, 2009 6:22 am, Majed B. wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I have posted my problem already here: >> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=7900571#post7900571 >> It also has file attachments of the output of mdadm -E /dev/sd[a-h]1 > > It seems that you need to log in to read the attachements... so I haven't. > >> >> I appreciate any help on this. > > Hopefully you just need to add "--force" to the assemble command > and it would all just work. However I haven't tested that on an array > that is in the process of a reshape so I cannot promise. > I might try to reproduce your situation and with some scratch drives > and check that mdadm -Af does the right thing, but it won't be a day > or so, and as I cannot see the --examine output I might get the > situation a bit wrong ... (hint hint: it is always best to post > full information rather than pointers to it, unless said information is > really really big). > > NeilBrown -- Majed B. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html