Re: man mdadm regarding --assume-clean says it's OK to use with RAID1 or 10, when creating:

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/8/23 Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>        "... It can also be used when creating a RAID1 or RAID10 if you want
>> to avoid  the  initial  resync ..."
>>
>>        I'm wondering why namely those levels are chosen and not RAID5/6 for e. g.?
>>
>>        I think it's also safe to use with RAID5/6, isn't it?
>
> RAID1/10 don't have parity calculations whereas RAID5/6 do.

	Well, and what does it change? I mean if we write some data to that
"assume clean" RAID5/6 the parity will be updated anyway.

-- 
End of message. Next message?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux