Re: max number of devices in raid6 array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 12 August, 2009 3:53 pm, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[...]
> And compute the overall MTBFS. With how many devices does the MTBFS of a
raid6 drop below that of a single disk?

First up, we probably want to be talking about Mean Time To Data Loss.
It'll vary enormously depending on how fast you think you can replace dead
drives, which in turn depends on how long a rebuild takes (since a dead
drive doesn't count as having been replaced until the new drive is fully
sync'ed). And building an array that big, it's going to be hard to get
drives all from different batches.

Anyway, someone asked Google a similar question:
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/730165.html and the MTTDL
for an 11-disc RAID-5 with 100,000-hour drives and a 24-hour
replacement+rebuild turnaround was 3.8 million hours (433 years), and a
RAID-6 was said to be "hundreds of times" more reliable. The 433 years
figure will be assuming that one drive failure doesn't cause another one,
though, so it's to be taken with a pinch of salt.

Cheers,

John.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux