Re: question about bitmaps and dirty percentile

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday July 30, jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> I saw this, which just *can't* be right:
> 
> md12 : active raid1 nbd0[2](W) sde[0]
>       72612988 blocks super 1.1 [3/1] [U__]
>       [======================================>]  recovery =192.7%
> (69979200/36306494) finish=13228593199978.6min speed=11620K/sec
>       bitmap: 139/139 pages [556KB], 256KB chunk

Certainly very strange.  I cannot explain it at all.

Please report exactly what kernel version you were running, all kernel
log messages from before the first resync completed until after the
sync-to-200% completed.

Hopefully there will be a clue somewhere in there.

Thanks,
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux