On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Andre Noll<maan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11:23, Raz wrote: > >> >> + if (mddev->level == 0) { >> >> + max_sectors = mddev->array_sectors; >> >> + j = mddev->recovery_cp; >> >> + } >> >> printk(KERN_INFO "md: %s of RAID array %s\n", desc, mdname(mddev)); >> >> printk(KERN_INFO "md: minimum _guaranteed_ speed:" >> >> " %d KB/sec/disk.\n", speed_min(mddev)); >> > >> > Hm, we want to get rid of personality-dependent code in md.c, so new >> > code should never check mddev->level. In the first hunk I think it >> > would be possible to check if pers->sync_request is NULL. >> No. sync_request does exists. this is what Neil wanted me to do. >> implement raid0_sync >> so I will be using md for this purpose. I knew that md patch is a >> problem, this is why I posted >> it first. > > OK, so pers->sync_request can't be used, but that was only one > possible option to replace the check mddev->level == 0 by something > more generic. BTW: The log message should describe in which case the > resync status shows an incorrect value and why one can not determine > which value to use for max_sectors by looking at mddev->recovery. > >> > Is the second hunk really necessary? AFAICS md_do_sync() won't be >> > called for raid0 anyway. >> second hunk is necessary for resume reshape. md_do_sync is called >> indirecrly by raid0d -->md_check_recovery. > > Yes, I didn't notice because raid0d() is introduced later in patch > 10/13 of your series. When introducing new and apparently dead code > it's always nice to let people know that the new code is going to be > used by a function that will be added in a subsequent patch :) noted. > Regards > Andre > -- > The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFKORh+Wto1QDEAkw8RAm3GAJ9orjx5oVNM/bCsmWwmYtPpa5s82gCdHxzE > 1+jPSDd77+YrehyaKDoeICE= > =XZIE > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html