Re: Subject:[PATCH 001:013]: md: Raid0 reshape

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Andre Noll<maan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11:23, Raz wrote:
>
>> >> +     if (mddev->level == 0) {
>> >> +             max_sectors = mddev->array_sectors;
>> >> +             j = mddev->recovery_cp;
>> >> +     }
>> >>       printk(KERN_INFO "md: %s of RAID array %s\n", desc, mdname(mddev));
>> >>       printk(KERN_INFO "md: minimum _guaranteed_  speed:"
>> >>               " %d KB/sec/disk.\n", speed_min(mddev));
>> >
>> > Hm, we want to get rid of personality-dependent code in md.c, so new
>> > code should never check mddev->level. In the first hunk I think it
>> > would be possible to check if pers->sync_request is NULL.
>> No. sync_request does exists. this is what Neil wanted me to do.
>> implement raid0_sync
>> so I will be using md for this purpose. I knew that md patch is a
>> problem, this is why I posted
>> it first.
>
> OK, so pers->sync_request can't be used, but that was only one
> possible option to replace the check mddev->level == 0 by something
> more generic. BTW: The log message should describe in which case the
> resync status shows an incorrect value and why one can not determine
> which value to use for max_sectors by looking at mddev->recovery.
>
>> > Is the second hunk really necessary? AFAICS md_do_sync() won't be
>> > called for raid0 anyway.
>> second hunk is necessary for resume reshape. md_do_sync is called
>> indirecrly by raid0d -->md_check_recovery.
>
> Yes, I didn't notice because raid0d() is introduced later in patch
> 10/13 of your series. When introducing new and apparently dead code
> it's always nice to let people know that the new code is going to be
> used by a function that will be added in a subsequent patch :)
noted.
> Regards
> Andre
> --
> The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFKORh+Wto1QDEAkw8RAm3GAJ9orjx5oVNM/bCsmWwmYtPpa5s82gCdHxzE
> 1+jPSDd77+YrehyaKDoeICE=
> =XZIE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux