On Wednesday June 3, dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Modify handle_stripe_fill6 to work asynchronously by introducing > fetch_block6 as the raid6 analog of fetch_block5 (schedule compute > operations for missing/out-of-sync disks). Following the theme from the previous patch, fetch_block5 is now just a special case of fetch_block6, so I think it would be best to use the same code. Once you do that, handle_stripe_fill6 and handle_stripe_fill5 become identical, so you only need handle_stripe_fill. NeilBrown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html