Re: RAID 5 re-add of removed drive? (failed drive replacement)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 02.06.2009, at 16:20, Jon Hardcastle wrote:

As always, most problems occur only during critical tasks
like
enlarging/restoring.

....

Is this a compelling case for regular

echo check >> /sys/block/mdX/md/sync_action

and/or

echo repair >> /sys/block/mdX/md/sync_action

??

Yes, indeed! Another lesson learned.
This might have prevented numerous cases in the past when disc surface errors occurred while enlarging and resizing a raid array. But all those serious incidents where handled perfectly and flawlessly by the software raid module. Congrats to all kernel developers here. The raid module is far more flexible, error prone and stable than any hardware raid solution I've seen so far.

Regards,
Alexander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux