Re: Raid and badblocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/5/26 Andrew Burgess <aab@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 13:59 +0100, Jeremy Sanders wrote:
>
>> Strangely, the Reallocated_Sector_Ct is still zero on the drive even though
>> Current_Pending_Sector is now zero. This is a Samsung HD103UJ by the way.
>
> That can be ok. It probably tried writing and then rereading and when
> that worked it decided the sector didn't really have a 'hard' error
> (like a physical defect on the platter) and thus didn't need to be
> reallocated to a spare sector. You could generate an unreadable sector
> during a write by the power failing or with excessive vibration.
>
I have a question, in this situation, if I do as Jeremy did, write
zero to bad block to make drive think it is not bad any more, then
what about old data? Isn't it lost?

> That said, the drive firmware could also be broken
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



-- 
The simplest is not all best but the best is surely the simplest!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux