Re: RAID5 in strange state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Frank Baumgart <frank.baumgart@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Adding an internal bitmap to an existing array will not destroy any
> data, correct?

Yes, safe to do at any time (as long as it's not syncing, in which
case it simply won't work).

> Anyway I wonder why the array did not come up automatically as 2 out of
> the 3 devices were still working and in sync.

Good question!  Hard to answer - it sure looks like it should have
assembled the two good drives and had the third drive as stopped.

-Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux