On 08:24, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Let me say that (a) I find the existing code very readable, but (b) I > find the suggested rewrite even more so, using (?:) notation. If you > really want to use a macro, see the attached and preprocess with "cc > -E" to expand the macro. I personally find the macro version really > hard to read. Yes, the macro is not much easier to read either. It's not only about readability btw. Doing the check at only one place makes it easier to change the code later, should that ever be necessary. It also reduces the probability of getting it wrong at one location without noticing. Regards Andre -- The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
