On Thursday March 26, raziebe@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Neil Hello > I will be grateful for your reply. Currently I am working on raid0 > code reshape. > 1. Will you be working on this functionality in the near future ? I have no plans for raid0 reshape or raid10 reshape. > 2. Should I save the superblocks like mdadm does in the case of 1,4,5,6 ? When the layout changes, you certainly have to update the superblock, yes. > 3. What is the heuristics of strip_zones ? why do we need them ? To make maximum use of available space. > > . non-power 2 raid0 chunk sizes. > 4. Other than segments masks issues, why isn't possible ? can't i fix raid0 > to support 3MB chunks with a segment of 1MB ? There is no intrinsic reason why chunk sizes should be powers of two. When I started working on the code that limit already existed and I have never had any reason to remove it. If you would like to create patches which provide support for non-power-of-two chunk sizes, I will be happy to review them. NeilBrown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
