On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:15 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Why does it? I don't see why you'd need to cover the vector-vector case > at all, since it doesn't appear anywhere in the algorithms. Certainly > going backwards from a vector-vector set to derive if you can do a > scalar-vector multiply when you should have known that in the first > place is not really useful. > >> >> Looking closer, the only other caller, async_pq_zero_sum, can be >> deleted because it has no users. So async_pq can become a static >> routine in async_r6recov. >> > > That's another issue entirely, of course :) > ...ah, but now I see your point and the root cause of the problem. The caller needs to be modified to only require scalar multiplication even in this corner case. Thanks, Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
