Re: What hardware for RAID5? (PCIe controller or fast onboard)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



A word of caution. 6 on-board SATA is not always enough. It is often the case
that using all will hit internal bandwidth limits. I find it common for 4 disks
to be handled OK but 5 are too much.

A simple test of 5 concurrent dd's will tell you if all disks are going full speed.
Some time one combination of 5 out of 6 (or 8) on-board sockets will perform better
than other and it is worth checking.

Eyal

Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Dexter Filmore <Dexter.Filmore@xxxxxx> writes:

I want to upgrade server hardware here, currently I have 5 Samsungs (sATA II) sitting on the onboard controller of an Asus K8N-E Socket754 board. I guess the controller chips are both connected via PCI hence performance isn't really hot.

Basically I need either a board with at least 6x sATA-II attached via PCIe or a "dumb" PCIe 4x or 8x controller card.

Any recommendations?

Dex

Anything that is not pci. PCIe or PCI-X will both be way
faster. Server boards with 6x SATA-II onboard are hard to miss. And
any cheap PCIe/PCI-X controler will probably do.

One important thing to think about is hotplug support. Do you need it
or not?

Look for a board and then check out http://linux-ata.org/ for support.

MfG
        Goswin

--
Eyal Lebedinsky	(eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux