John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 01/03/2009 08:52, Daniel Pittman wrote: > >> I have a random desktop machine here, running Debian/sid with a 2.6.26 >> Debian kernel. It has a two disk software RAID1, and apparently passes >> through a suspend/resume cycle correctly, but... > > I'm not sure if this is the same suspend/resume - there are after all several > Googleable reasons why one might suspend or resume various things - but it > might be worth a look at NeilB's recent post of a patch to "hopefully enable > suspend/resume of md devices": > http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=123440845819870&w=2 No, that appears to be about suspending and resuming access to the MD device while reconfiguring it; I don't /think/ that is accessed during a system-wide suspend/resume (aka hibernate, or s2disk) cycle. Certainly, it doesn't look like the path is invoked for that from my reading of the code. Regards, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
