On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Ray Van Dolson <rvandolson@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 08:47:33AM -0800, Iain Rauch wrote: >> > The typical use case for me is this: I will run the array (/dev/md11) in >> > degraded mode (without /dev/nbd0) for a week or so. >> > At some point, I will try to synchronize the underlying devices. >> >> Sounds like rsync is more suited to your application. >> Why are you using RAID? >> >> Iain > > Seems academic to me. Whatever the reasons, the above _should_ work > should it not? > > Could this be NBD's fault somehow? I don't think so. This is how I *remove* the nbd device: mdadm /dev/md11 --fail /dev/nbd0 sleep 3 mdadm /dev/md11 --remove /dev/nbd0 and then finally nbd-client -d /dev/nbd0 If necessary, I can try to simulate the problem by using a local logical volume or some such. -- Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
