Re: raid1 + 2.6.27.7 issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Iain Rauch
<groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The typical use case for me is this: I will run the array (/dev/md11) in
>> degraded mode (without /dev/nbd0) for a week or so.
>> At some point, I will try to synchronize the underlying devices.
>
> Sounds like rsync is more suited to your application.
> Why are you using RAID?

If I were transferring files then rsync would be fine. Files have
mutable state (applications may be writing to them at the time of
transfer, etc...) and a whole host of other issues.

> Why are you using RAID?

I want a *mirror* of the block device.


-- 
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux