Re: HugePages for MD's caches -- can this be done in modern kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, February 7, 2009 6:27 am, Igor Podlesny wrote:
> 2009/2/7 NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>:
>> On Sat, February 7, 2009 5:08 am, Igor Podlesny wrote:
>>>    Hi!
>>>
>>>    $(Subj). :-)
>>>
>>>    P. S. Also, I deem there lots of structures in kernel that could
>>> benefit
>>> from using HugePages. But this probably a q-n for another kernel list.
>>
>> I have only a vague idea what HugePages are and it is not at all clear
>> to
>> me why you would want to use them for the MD cache.   I assume you are
>>
> 	HugePages requires less TBL entries so they better fit for large
> buffers, as far as I understand.
>
> 	http://unixfoo.blogspot.com/2007/10/hugepages.html
> 	http://linux-mm.org/HugePagesArticles
>
>> talking about MD/RAID456 as that is the only place we use a cache.
>>
> 	Yeah, "stripe_cache_size" setting.
>>
>> Maybe if you could explain what you are thinking....
>>
> 	Yeah, hope this would suffice.

Not really, no.
md does not use "large buffers",  Just lots of little buffers.

NeilBrown

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux