Re: Any hope for a 27 disk RAID6+1HS array with four disks reporting "No md superblock detected"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas J. Baker wrote:
The array was made probably two years ago and had been working fine
until recently. In reading the documentation for mdadm, it did seem like
it should have required me to use the higher version but it never
complained when I made it and worked fine.

What have you changed lately? Are the drives all on a single controller? Are you using PARTITIONS in mdadm.conf and letting mdadm find things for itself?

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
 "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux