On 16:31, Peter Rabbitson wrote: > Is it possible that the following issue is related to your earlier > patches: http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=123202024116493&w=2 I don't think this is possible because you are using Linux 2.6.24.7 which does not contain any of the block -> sector conversion changes. Moreover, those changes should be invisible to userspace. In particular, mdadm does not need to know whether the kernel uses blocks or sectors for its internal representations. In fact, no changes to mdadm were made wrt. the block -> sector conversions. Can you reproduce the incorrect output for the used device size with the recent master branch of the mdadm git tree? Thanks Andre -- The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
