On Fri Jan 16, 2009 at 11:51:24AM +0100, Henry, Andrew wrote: > > I believe it would be helpful to many to note in the mdadm manual > > page, that only version 0.90 superblocks can be auto-detected by > > current kernels. > > > > Nagy Attila Gabor > > You know, I used 0.90 superblocks on CentOS 5.2 and they were > recognized (ie assembled so that Cat/proc/mdstat saw the discs). > > I just moved to Ubuntu with 2.6.27 and decided on 1.2 superblocks and > they were auto assembled anyway. Is this what we mean when we say > "autodetected by the kernel" or have I misunderstood? > > If im right then it doesn't seem to be an issue with later kernels. > Most current distributions use a ramdisk to load up a base system (busybox + a few other tools) which allows for more advanced detection of arrays than the kernel can do itself. This is what you'll be seeing - without a ramdisk the kernel will fail to assemble arrays with 1.0+ superblocks. Cheers, Robin -- ___ ( ' } | Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | / / ) | Little Jim says .... | // !! | "He fallen in de water !!" |
Attachment:
pgpWX86ajNWY3.pgp
Description: PGP signature