Re: mdadm man page update proposed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri Jan 16, 2009 at 11:51:24AM +0100, Henry, Andrew wrote:

> > I believe it would be helpful to many to note in the mdadm manual
> > page, that only version 0.90 superblocks can be auto-detected by
> > current kernels.
> >
> > Nagy Attila Gabor
> 
> You know, I used 0.90 superblocks on CentOS 5.2 and they were
> recognized (ie assembled so that Cat/proc/mdstat saw the discs).
> 
> I just moved to Ubuntu with 2.6.27 and decided on 1.2 superblocks and
> they were auto assembled anyway.  Is this what we mean when we say
> "autodetected by the kernel" or have I misunderstood?
> 
> If im right then it doesn't seem to be an issue with later kernels.
> 
Most current distributions use a ramdisk to load up a base system
(busybox + a few other tools) which allows for more advanced detection
of arrays than the kernel can do itself.  This is what you'll be seeing
- without a ramdisk the kernel will fail to assemble arrays with 1.0+
superblocks.

Cheers,
    Robin
-- 
     ___        
    ( ' }     |       Robin Hill        <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
   / / )      | Little Jim says ....                            |
  // !!       |      "He fallen in de water !!"                 |

Attachment: pgpWX86ajNWY3.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux