Re: Interesting article

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Maurice Hilarius <maurice@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I read this today:
> http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=162
>
> Would anyone who knows enough about this care to comment?

We need disks continuously scanned in spare cycles, and offline the
drives (or remap the sectors) as soon as an error is found.

Also, when rebuilding an array, don't stop due to a read failure.
mark the sector as bad and complete the rebuild.

Waiting for a drive to fail has been too late to recover the array, in
my experience.

Chris
>
> Thanks in advance for any thoughts..
>
>
> --
> With our best regards,
>
> //Maurice W. Hilarius         Telephone: 01-780-456-9771/
> /Hard Data Ltd.                FAX:          01-780-456-9772/
> /11060 - 166 Avenue         email:maurice@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
> /Edmonton, AB, Canada/
> /     T5X 1Y3/
> /
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux