Re: RFC: detection of silent corruption via ATA long sector reads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "John" == John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

John> Essentially DIF on 32k blocks instead of 512 byte ones. But
John> perhaps this is a bad assumption and MD/DM already optimises out
John> whole-chunk reads and writes where they're not required (for very
John> short, less-than-one-chunk transactions), and I've no idea whether
John> this happens a lot.

I haven't looked at the RAID4/5/6 code for a long time so I'm not sure
whether they only write dirty pages or the whole chunk + parity ditto.
Neil?

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux