Re: MD Feature Request: non-degraded component replacement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Lars Schimmer wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Justin Piszcz wrote:


On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, David Greaves wrote:

Personally I think this feature is more important than the reshaping
requests;
of course that's just one opinion after replacing about 20 flaky 1Tb
drives in
the past 6 months :)
What were the make/model of those drives, how did they fail?

Far more important: how much do you have in production?
AS I got roughly 15 Seagate 1 GB HDs here and not one of them failed for
the last year.
And 20 of 30 running is really bad, but 20 from 500 running is not as
bad as it seems ;-)
Agree, but I would still be interested in the make/model and what controller they were attached to and how they failed?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux