Re: weird issues with raid1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Monday December 15, jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> I hope this helps.
>
> Yes it does, though I generally prefer to get more complete logs.  If
> I get the surrounding log lines then I know what isn't there as well
> as what is - and it isn't always clear at first which bits will be
> important.

Quite literally the rest of /var/log/messages was stuff unrelated
(dhcp, etc...). However, I'll try to include more context next time.

> The problem here is that --incremental doesn't provide the --re-add
> functionality that you are depending on.  That was an oversight on my
> part.  I'll see if I can get it fixed.
> In the mean time, you'll need to use --re-add (or --add, it does the
> same thing in your situation) to add nbd0 to the array.

Why does it usually work as though I *had* used --re-add (and
specified the right array)?


-- 
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux