mdadm --incremental seems to behave differently for me between mdadm 2.6.4 and 3.0 With 2.6.4, mdadm --incremental /dev/nbd0 does this: mdadm: /dev/nbd0 attached to /dev/md10 which is already active. With 3.0, it does this: mdadm: /dev/md10 is already in use. and does *not* add it to the array. -- Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
