Re: status of raid 4/5 disk reduce

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:33:51AM -0500, Michael Brancato wrote:
>
> David Lethe wrote:
>
>>   Respectfully, go bother the LVM, jfs, ext, afs, and all the other 
>> file
>> system people.  You have zero chance of getting them on board to support
>> online file system shrinking without any guarantee of scratch space.
>> My advice is that you don't tell them you also want them to resize while
>> the md volume is being resized, and also don't tell them that the array
>> might be degraded.
>
> I didn't bring up nor argued the filesystem online resize issue, you  
> did.  Why does the filesystem have to be online during the reshape or  
> the shrink?  People shrink filesystems and partitions while offline  
> everyday, and the sun still rises.  Filesystem support for reshaping  
> (not resizing) should be a non-issue.  Resizing shrink exists today.

Not for xfs.

-- 
http://www.critikart.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux