Justin Piszcz wrote:
Someone should write a document with XFS and barrier support, if I
recall,
in the past, they never worked right on raid1 or raid5 devices, but it
appears now they they work on RAID1, which slows down performance ~12
times!!
I would expect you, as an experienced tester, to have done this
measurement more rigorously!
I don't think it means much if this is what you did.
l1:~# /usr/bin/time tar xf linux-2.6.27.7.tar 0.15user 1.54system
0:13.18elapsed 12%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+325minor)pagefaults 0swaps
l1:~#
l1:~# /usr/bin/time tar xf linux-2.6.27.7.tar
0.14user 1.66system 2:39.68elapsed 1%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+324minor)pagefaults 0swaps
l1:~#
Before doing any disk test you need to start by dropping cache, to be
sure the appropriate reproducible things happen. And in doing a timing
test, you need to end with a sync for the same reason.
So:
echo 1 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
time bash -c "YOUR TEST; sync"
This will give you a fair shot at being able to reproduce the results,
done on an otherwise unloaded system.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
