Re: striping of a 4 drive raid10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:33:45 +0100, Keld Jørn Simonsen
>>> <keld@xxxxxxxx> said:

keld> Hi I have tried to make a striping raid out of my new 4 x
keld> 1 TB SATA-2 disks. I tried raid10,f2 in several ways:

keld> 1: md0 = raid10,f2 of sda1+sdb1, md1= raid10,f2 of sdc1+sdd1, md2 = raid0
keld>    of md0+md1
keld> 2: md0 = raid0 of sda1+sdb1, md1= raid0 of sdc1+sdd1, md2 = raid01,f2
keld>    of md0+md1
keld> 3: md0 = raid10,f2 of sda1+sdb1, md1= raid10,f2 of sdc1+sdd1, chunksize of 
keld>    md0 =md1 =128 KB,  md2 = raid0 of md0+md1 chunksize = 256 KB
keld> 4: md0 = raid0 of sda1+sdb1, md1= raid0 of sdc1+sdd1, chunksize
keld>    of md0 = md1 = 128 KB, md2 = raid01,f2 of md0+md1 chunksize = 256 KB

These stacked RAID levels don't make a lot of sense.

keld> 5: md0= raid10,f4 of sda1+sdb1+sdc1+sdd1

This also does not make a lot of sense. Why have four mirrors
instead of two?

Instead, try 'md0 = raid10,f2' for example. The first mirror of
will be striped across the outer half of all four drives, and
the second mirrors will be rotated in the inner half of each
drive.

Which of course means that reads will be quite quick, but writes
and degraded operation will be slower.

Consider this post for more details:

  http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg18130.html

[ ... ]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux