Re: write-intent bitmaps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday January 27, russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/01/msg00921.html
> 
> Are they regarded as a stable feature?  If so I'd like to see distributions 
> supporting them by default.  I've started a discussion in Debian on this 
> topic, see the above URL for details.

Yes, it is regarded as stable.

However it can be expected to reduce write throughput.  A reduction of
several percent would not be surprising, and depending in workload it
could probably be much higher.

It is quite easy to add or remove a bitmap on an active array, so
making it a default would probably be fine providing it was easy for
an admin to find out about it and remove the bitmap is they wanted the
extra performance.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux