On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 05:52:57PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Wednesday January 9, cat@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > I'd provide data dumps of --examine and friends but I'm in a situation
> > where transferring the data would be a right pain. I'll do it if need
> > be, though.
> >
> > So, what can I do?
>
> Well, providing the output of "--examine" would help a lot.
Here's the output of the 3 remaining drives, the array and mdstat.
/proc/mdstat:
Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
...
md3 : inactive sdf1[0] sde1[2] sdd1[1]
1465151808 blocks
...
unused devices: <none>
/dev/md3:
Version : 00.90.03
Creation Time : Thu Aug 30 15:50:01 2007
Raid Level : raid5
Device Size : 488383936 (465.76 GiB 500.11 GB)
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 3
Preferred Minor : 3
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Thu Jan 3 08:51:00 2008
State : active, degraded
Active Devices : 3
Working Devices : 3
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
UUID : f60a1be0:5a10f35f:164afef4:10240419
Events : 0.45649
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 81 0 active sync /dev/sdf1
1 8 49 1 active sync /dev/sdd1
2 8 65 2 active sync /dev/sde1
3 0 0 - removed
/dev/sdd1:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.90.03
UUID : f60a1be0:5a10f35f:164afef4:10240419
Creation Time : Thu Aug 30 15:50:01 2007
Raid Level : raid5
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Preferred Minor : 3
Update Time : Thu Jan 3 08:51:00 2008
State : active
Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 4
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Checksum : cb259d08 - correct
Events : 0.45649
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 1 8 49 1 active sync /dev/sdd1
0 0 8 81 0 active sync /dev/sdf1
1 1 8 49 1 active sync /dev/sdd1
2 2 8 65 2 active sync /dev/sde1
3 3 8 33 3 active sync /dev/sdc1
/dev/sde1:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.90.03
UUID : f60a1be0:5a10f35f:164afef4:10240419
Creation Time : Thu Aug 30 15:50:01 2007
Raid Level : raid5
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Preferred Minor : 3
Update Time : Thu Jan 3 08:51:00 2008
State : active
Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 4
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Checksum : cb259d1a - correct
Events : 0.45649
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 2 8 65 2 active sync /dev/sde1
0 0 8 81 0 active sync /dev/sdf1
1 1 8 49 1 active sync /dev/sdd1
2 2 8 65 2 active sync /dev/sde1
3 3 8 33 3 active sync /dev/sdc1
/dev/sdf1:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.90.03
UUID : f60a1be0:5a10f35f:164afef4:10240419
Creation Time : Thu Aug 30 15:50:01 2007
Raid Level : raid5
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Preferred Minor : 3
Update Time : Thu Jan 3 08:51:00 2008
State : active
Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 4
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Checksum : cb259d26 - correct
Events : 0.45649
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 0 8 81 0 active sync /dev/sdf1
0 0 8 81 0 active sync /dev/sdf1
1 1 8 49 1 active sync /dev/sdd1
2 2 8 65 2 active sync /dev/sde1
3 3 8 33 3 active sync /dev/sdc1
> But I suspect that "--assemble --force" would do the right thing.
> Without more details, it is hard to say for sure.
I suspect so aswell but throwing caution into the wind erks me wrt this
raid array. :)
--
"To the extent that we overreact, we proffer the terrorists the
greatest tribute."
- High Court Judge Michael Kirby
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
