Re: On the subject of RAID-6 corruption recovery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Thiemo Nagel wrote:

What you call "pathologic" cases when it comes to real-world data are very common. It is not at all unusual to find sectors filled with only a constant (usually zero, but not always), in which case your **512 becomes **1.

Of course it would be easy to check how many of the 512 Bytes are really different on a case-by-case basis and correct the exponent accordingly, and only perform the recovery when the corrected probability of introducing an error is sufficiently low.

What is the alternative to recovery, really? Just erroring out and letting the admin deal with it, or blindly assume that the parity is wrong?


Erroring out.  Only thing to do at that point.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux